
NOVEMBER TOPICS
Round 1 and 2: Paper Towels are better than Hand
Dryers.
Round 3 and 4 Topic: Impromptu Topics.
JANUARY TOPICS
Round 1 and 2: The United States should significantly increase regulations on
cryptocurrency.
Round 3 and 4 Topic: Impromptu Topics.
MARCH TOPICS
Round 1 and 2: The AI race between China and United States is more harmful than beneficial.
Round 3
and Finals Topic: Impromptu Topics.
MAY/CHAMPIONSHIP TOPIC Round 1 and 2:
TBA
Round 3
and 4 Topic: Impromptu Topics.
Topic announce in Rounds 1 and 2 (prepared topic),
then 20 minutes of Preparation Time
(may view files/documents—NO use of the internet).
Topic announce in Round 3 and 4 (impromptu topics),
then 30 minutes of Preparation Time
(with NO viewing of any
files/documents--printed/computer/internet).
The tournament may
announce where you are expected to go for your Preparation Time.
Tournament provided flow paper may be required.
Follow that
guidance.
1st
Prop speaker: 5 minutes
(present
prop case)
1st
Opp speaker: 5 minutes
(respond to
prop case and present opp case)
OPP CASES SHOULD NOT BE LONGER THAN 3 MINUTES. Spend a significant amount
of your time responding.
2nd
Prop speaker: 5 minutes
(defend
prop case, respond to opp case, if time, add to prop
case)
Spend at least 3 minutes of your speech responding to the Opp Case and
defending your Prop case. NEW PROP CASE CONTENTIONS SHOULD NOT TAKE LONGER THAN
2 MINUTES.
2nd
Opp speaker: 5 minutes
(defend opp case, defend responses to opp
case, respond to new points)
Spend at least 3 minutes of your speech defending the Opp Case and
defending your responses to the Prop case and any new points raised by the 2nd
Prop. ADDITIONAL NEW OPP CASE CONTENTIONS SHOULD NOT TAKE LONGER THAN 2 MINUTES
UNLESS THERE IS A MAJOR NEED TO BOLSTER THE OPP CASE.
3rd
Opp speaker: 5 minutes
(show
partners’ won the opp case and defeated the prop
case)
AVOID MAKING NEW ARGUMENTS. Stick to defending your partners’ arguments
and showing why they are stronger than their opponents.
3rd
Prop speaker: 5 minutes
(show
partners’ won the prop case and defeated opp case)
AVOID MAKING NEW ARGUMENTS EXCEPT FOR NEW ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY THE 2ND
AND 3RD OPP. Stick to defending your partners’ arguments and showing
why they are stronger than their opponents.
AT ALL TIMES—TREAT EACH OTHER RIGHT—WITH SUPPORT.
Middle School Debaters can be aged 10 to 14; exceptions to this
require Jim Hanson’s approval.
Prep Time Rules
You CAN view materials you researched/prepared before prep time
started EXCEPT you cannot view any materials if it is an impromptu topic.
You CAN talk with your debate partners
You CAN hand write notes/flow arguments for your speeches.
You CANNOT research online at any point
during prep time.
You CANNOT get argument help from
coach(es) or parent(s) at any point during prep time.
NOTE YOU CANNOT USE typed items during
the debate except for ADA reasons.
Debating in
Person?
Use the Tournament provided colored flow paper.
During the Debate
You CAN use
HAND WRITTEN notes prepared during Prep Time.
In Person? The notes must be on the tournament provided colored flow paper.
You may NOT attach/tape pre-prepared notes to your flow paper.
You CANNOT
view nor use materials during the debate that were prepared before prep time.
You CANNOT use materials on your computer/tablet/phone during the debate except
for ADA reasons. Use handwritten notes ONLY and use your computer only for
Zoom.
You can use a cell phone as a timer BUT you cannot use it for any other reason except in an emergency.
You CAN
pass notes or text message/chat with your debate partners.
You CAN quietly speak with your debate partners who are not speaking.
You CANNOT
research during the debate.
You CANNOT get help
from coach(es) or parent(s) during the debate.
You CANNOT speak to teammates who are speaking.
No
heckling.
POIs
(questions/short arguments) allowed in ALL speeches for the middle 3 minutes of
the speeches.
Each
speaker must take two POIs except they do not take POIs requested less than 30
seconds after taking a POI.
When there
is an impromptu topic for a debate, logic and reasons should be given just as
much weight as a debater citing a study/statistic/fact.